Investigative Journalist Diane Dimond ‘Stunned’ By Casey Anthony Verdict, Explains What Possibly Swayed Jurors
Like most of the country following the high-profile case of Case Anthony, investigative journalist and correspondent for Newsweek/The Daily Beast, Diane Dimond was utterly ‘shocked and appalled’ by the not-guilty verdict on the 2008 murder charges of 2-year-old Caylee.
Having covered the O.J. Simpson trial extensively in 1995, Diane offered up her expert explanation this morning with The K-EARTH 101 Morning Show on what convinced the jurors to come out of deliberation with a not-guilty charge in hand.
Even though Diane agrees that the jurors selected for the trial were good and unbiased, she was stunned by the outcome of the case that she thought for sure Casey would be charged for at least negligent child abuse for not reporting her daughter missing for 31 days.
[pullquote quote="They couldn't sew it up like that." credit="Diane Dimond on the Casey Anthony trial"]
So what could have played a factor in the jurors’ decision to acquit Casey of any murder charges of her daughter Caylee? Diane explains since a “murder is a solitary crime,” it was hard to fit Casey to the charges she was accused of since there were no witnesses.
“They couldn’t put the duct tape roll in Casey Anthony’s hand. There was chloroform in the trunk of her car — high levels of it — but they couldn’t put Casey Anthony at the Target store buying the supplies to make chloroform, or buying it online or anywhere else,” explains Diane. “They couldn’t sew it up like that.”
To hear Diane to explain more about the trial and what possibly played a part in the jurors’ decision to acquit Casey of murder charges, listen to the full interview with the K-EARTH 101 Morning Show below: